#164 The End of Ford in Brazil
A few weeks ago, the news came down hard, but not unexpected – Ford would close its manufacturing operation in Brazil. To add insult to injury, the news came in the year in which the Detroit, US-based manufacturer was supposed to celebrate its 100th anniversary in the land of samba, feijoada, and cachaca.
In 1921, Henry Ford started operations in Brazil, hoping to grow rubber trees and produce rubber tyres – an endeavor that was brought to an abrupt halt when trees died after about 17 years. Ford stayed nonetheless and started to operate out of rented facilities in Sao Paulo. Over the next 100 years the car company built new factories, closed others, designed, modified, and adapted different models for the Brazilian market.
With vehicle sales dropping more than 26% in Brazil in 2020, the COVID-19 pandemic of 2020 and 2021 certainly accelerated Ford’s departure from Brazil, but it also wasn’t the only factor. The decision to close manufacturing plants is part of a larger, global restructuring of the car maker. At a deeper level, it is also is related to complex and long-lasting challenges in Brazil’s business environment. As The Economist reported, Brazil’s bureaucracy unduly burdens the automotive industry, and workers’ comparatively low productivity added its own difficulties – a phenomenon that is often described as the “Brazil cost”.
Oh, and did I mention that packing up and leaving a country doesn’t come cheaply either? Ford estimates that the cost of withdrawing from Brazil will be between $4 – $5 billion US$…
January 30, 2021 @ 2:08 pm
Even a 100-year celebration is of no use if a company decides to withdraw from a market. In this particular case, the production facility in Brazil was closed, bringing a long tradition to an end. It was clear from the outset that the Brazilian market was not an easy one. The slump in car sales accelerated the departure, which had been sealed for some time for internal reasons.
Of course, this happens again and again in the course of a company’s history, especially in the case of very large corporations, where attempts are made to increase production and profits in the medium term by restructuring and changing the global business area. However, I can only understand the reference to challenges in the local environment to a limited extent, since it is already necessary to take a close look at the situation in the course of a first-time entry into a specific global market as well as during regular re-evaluations and to act accordingly. The “Brazil costs” mentioned were hopefully calculated in advance and subjected to an appropriate risk assessment. Otherwise, one could only say: “Self-blame, obviously nothing learned”.
In the long term, the departure from the Brazilian market will be expensive for Ford. Not only because of the costs of withdrawal, but also in terms of setting up at another location. And building up competence, knowledge and experience at a new location was never cheap!
February 7, 2021 @ 3:54 pm
As unsurprising Ford’s decision to close their manufacturing operation in Brazil was, it still shows how challenging the business environment for manufacturing companies in the country has become (or always has been?). As highlighted by the Financial Times, the problems organizations are faced with are not only excessive and complicated tax rules, legal uncertainties but also low productivity. Most of the productions plants in Brazil only run at around 50% of their intended capacity and just recently other major player such as Mercedes and Volkswagen announced to close specific factories.
Given the massive shift happening in the global automotive industry right now and the opportunities that come with it, the question arises which role Brazil will play in the future tech-focused e-mobility? In order to attract global organizations to enter and invest in the Brazilian market going forward, the “Custo Brasil” might be ready for profound change.
After all, as one of the biggest car markets in the world, the country would have a lot to offer.
February 21, 2021 @ 12:30 pm
Like foreign investment, foreign divestment is an integral part of internationalization. It is a core strategic aspect of a MNE to select the best locations for conducting business. While investment and growth sound exciting, divestment leaves a stale taste to it.
Being the world’s seventh largest economy and the eighth biggest automotive producer, the closing of operations in Brazil is a huge setback. For Ford, this step is part of a strategic restructuring attempt to boost profitability in the region. After a century of business in Brazil, in recent times the company reported repeated losses in the region. Ford is not exiting the market but restructuring its operations by sourcing vehicles from nearby plants but maintaining the SA headquarters and other divisions in Brazil.
Despite the so-called ‘Brazilian cost’, the recent economic crisis and the major consequences of the Covid-19 pandemic hit the country hard and surely contributed to making this business decision. I can imagine it is not an easy step for Ford CEO Jim Farley to send roughly 5.000 people to unemployment. The announced of working out a plan to mitigate the impacts of closing production together with its unions is a necessary step for a responsible MNE.
February 21, 2021 @ 6:22 pm
The case of Ford shows the accelerating negative impact of the Corona crisis on the automotive industry. Already in the last few years, a paradigm shift towards e-mobility within the industry became apparent and it quickly became clear which companies were able to cope with these changes and which were not. As described, companies like Ford have to counteract financial losses through restructuring programs in order to be prepared for the future. As already known through media reports, similar decisions were made by Ford for the UK, France, Russia and Germany. However, example such as Tesla proofed, that companies can also act differently. The company is building so-called gigafactories worldwide. These facilities are built to cover the growing demand for battery systems. One can only hope for traditional companies like Ford, which is one of the pioneers of today’s industry (introduction of assembly line production), that their strategy for the future includes a balance between cost reduction and sustainable innovation.
Regarding Brazil, although a strategic decision has been made to make production more efficient, thousands of unemployed workers create a bitter aftertaste and generations of families who worked in Ford’s factories must now hope for better days to come.